Friday, February 26, 2016

Week 3/ Sutures

Hi Everyone,

In today’s post, I will start off by covering some basic properties of sutures, as I will soon begin the experimental component of my project!

Nurolon
To begin, there are so many different types of sutures!!!! Last week, I finally began the process of looking through which ones were available for testing at the office. There are so many boxes of them, with different sizes and properties. To give a brief overview, there are two main distinctions between sutures: absorbable vs. nonabsorbable, braided (multifilament) vs. non-braided (monofilament). Absorbable sutures refer to those made of materials which are broken down/absorbed by the tissue after a given period of time. Thus, absorbable sutures are advantageous for use in many of the internal tissues of the body, since no foreign material would be left inside the body once the sutures dissolve and there is no need for the patient to have them removed. Non-absorbable sutures, on the other hand, are permanent. More on sutures next week, but if you want to read more about them, click here.
Regular Silk



Regarding my experiment on sutures, last week I conducted a few trials (see here) The data is limited, as I simply tested out the function of the machine using a few already opened sutures, and my knot-tying skills are still far from perfect. However, in the weeks to come, I hope to run several more tests, and will continue to update this document.
V-loc

This week in particular, I ran into a significant challenge while testing the new V-loc sutures. I found out through my trail that the V-loc sutures are not only hard to tie (the tensile machine requires that the suture be secured around the two hooks), but are also a lot shorter than the other types of sutures. Most sutures are about 45 cm long; the V-loc ones are 15 cm. This, admittedly, is part of the V-loc’s design: it is a ‘barbed’ suture, which structure eliminates the need to tie knots. In terms of testing the tensile strength, though, the V-loc’s qualities make it difficult to experiment on.


Lastly, my journey in the OR continues: this week, I observed a Nissen fundoplication, an operation I first read about on Roshan’s blog from last year! It was a really cool procedure to see in person, especially standing right next to the operating table. It was, like the pyloromyotomy from last week, a laparoscopic procedure. To briefly explain the procedure, the surgery is designed to prevent or lessen gastric reflux (vomiting). To do this, the top portion of the stomach is wrapped around the esophagus and held together with a few sutures. This configuration allows the pressure in the stomach (after eating) to create a sort of valve in the lower esophagus.




After the stomach/esophagus looks like the picture above, a G(astrostomy)-tube was inserted through the abdomen. The entire surgery took about three hours and most of it consisted of clearing out the esophagus/stomach area. There was a lot of adipose tissue in the area, and the liver and spleen had to be moved out of the way. Lastly, the surgeons had to be very careful not the cut the vagus nerve, which controls parasympathetic functions such as heart rate and digestion.

In other news, this week the hospital was visited by Arizona Kettle Corn Company, and during break, everyone brought back small, brown paper bags of kettle corn. Their arrival seemed to considerably brighten everyone’s day, including mine.




This was a really exciting week for me! Hope all of you found the procedure to be as interesting as I did. I apologize for not being able to cover the abscess mentioned from last week—it will definitely be featured in my next post.

Best,

Vanessa

5 comments:

  1. Sounds like you had a great week!

    I'm really glad that you described the kinds of sutures you will be working with. :)

    You mentioned the functional differences between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures:
    Are the non-absorbable ones used for external wounds/cuts, like if you split your chin open and have to get stitches?...Or do the uses of absorbable vs. non-absorbable solely depend on depth of wound/lasting time of the suture?

    Also, what is the functional difference between braided and non-braided sutures...purely tensile strength, or size of the suture?

    Thanks so much for sharing your OR experiences as well. It seems like a VERY amped up Anatomy/dissection class (this is SO cool!).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mia, thanks for your great questions! Absorbable ones are more 'useful' per se when used for internal tissue because it eliminates the need to remove them. And with skin/external cuts, removing the sutures would be a lot easier because they are so superficial. I guess it depends on both factors: a surgeon would choose which suture depending on the wound's healing time (this has to correspond with how long the suture stays intact before it begins to lose tensile strength) and the location of the stitches. Braided sutures cause more inflammation than monofilament, but require less knots to secure b/c there is more friction.

      Delete
  2. Hey Vanessa, nice post! For the Nissen fundoplication, did you stay in the room for the entire procedure, and if so, how does one maintain their energy for that long?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Alex. During the operation I stood near the operating table the whole time--my feet often fell asleep and I had to move around a little to bring them back XD Since I was only watching, it wasn't too bad for me. For the surgeons, however, I imagine it would be quite hard, especially for those who are holding a retractor or the scope in place.

      Delete
  3. I'm afraid that what I know the tensile strength can be tested is different to you. But it is also useful.

    ReplyDelete